Compare

How we compare

Honest comparisons, including the cases where the other product is the right answer. Every claim about someone else's software describes what they publish themselves, and carries the date we last checked it.

EasyCruiter vs Greenhouse

Greenhouse is built for in-house talent teams running a structured hiring process. EasyCruiter is built for the placement: hire, employ, bill the client, pay the commission.

Greenhouse — Applicant tracking and hiring software.

EasyCruiter vs Workable

Workable spans hiring and employee management. EasyCruiter adds the part neither an ATS nor an HR suite models: the placement, the client invoice and the commission.

Workable — Talent management platform.

EasyCruiter vs Lever

Lever is a recruiting-first ATS and CRM. EasyCruiter keeps going after the hire — through the employment, the client invoice and the commission.

Lever — Recruiting software and applicant tracking.

EasyCruiter vs HiBob

HiBob runs HR and payroll for your own employees. EasyCruiter runs the same lifecycle for people you place at clients — and bills for them.

HiBob — HR software for people, payroll and finance.

EasyCruiter vs Deel

Deel employs and pays people across borders. EasyCruiter runs the hiring that comes first and the client billing that comes after.

Deel — Global people platform — payroll, HR and compliance.

The short version

Applicant trackers are built for a company hiring its own staff. HR suites and employer-of-record platforms are built for employing and paying that staff once hired. Several now do both, and do them well.

What none of them model is the client. If you place people at customers — an agency, a staffing firm, a cross-border delivery team — the placement is the unit that matters: what it bills, what it costs, what margin it earns and what commission it owes. That is the shape EasyCruiter is built around, with the hiring and the employment either side of it on the same record.